An incite about K-12

An issue that broke havoc, both in the field of education and publicly was a new system curriculum called K- 12. Last 2010 it was officially made a Law. All students that would be subjected to the said system have to fallow different probation than the basic education system prior to it.             But how…


An issue that broke havoc, both in the field of education and publicly was a new system curriculum called K- 12. Last 2010 it was officially made a Law. All students that would be subjected to the said system have to fallow different probation than the basic education system prior to it.

            But how much do people really know regarding K-12? Those people outside the league of education normal citezens, parents and most especially, students?

            Basically K-12 (can be pronounced as K to 12 or K plus 12) is an education curriculum based on the educational system that U.S.A. use today. It isconsist of (K) Kindergarten and both six in primary and secindary (12). Levels are addressed as Grades from 1 – 12. Aside from the terminolody, there are also some drastic changes in curriculum. Other than the conventional academic sebjects such as, Math, English, Science, etc. K-12 students also have indroductions to foreign languages like Japanese. Thay can as well master technical skills of their choice or any offered by the school in a span of two years in secondary level. Which will be certified by TESDA. Thus, enabling students to have the advantage like of a vocational collage graduate.

            Goverment same as the DepEd believes that K-12 is the long awaited solution to the Country’s top problem: Unemployment rate and poverty. And based on a survey done by the Social Weather Station, third quater last 2012, 68% of the public persived that DepEd’s K-12 would indeed solve the said problems. It is undoubtedly that it is a huge rate. But going back to the question “how much do they really know?”, As good as it sounds, that great countries such as U.S. and Australia uses this, the precense of faults are inhabitable.

            There are three major loopholes in this program.

1.) Even if the K-12 graduates have certificates, how could they have more chances when those who actually have diplomas were unemployed.

2.) There will be two years of transition where in there would be no fresh enrolist for collage. Wouldn’t that affect the stability of provincial Universities and Collages?

3.) Some schools have defficiency on facilities as it is. How can those manange the added years?

            Surely, flaws do not indicate failure. The program has been running its third year and it is too early to judge. So ever said the qoute “You’ll never know until you get there” definately has a point. Let us just make most of the equation at hand and live future do its job. Answering

By: LANI F. DULDULAO | Limay National High School