English is considered as the universal language, and linguists say that the sole purpose of language is communication. If we will follow the given statement, therefore, we can infer that the sole purpose of English is communication.
Communication is the encoding and decoding of meanings given by the sender to the receiver. It is the interpretation of symbols and meanings given by two parties providing their outputs. Communication may vary from simple little chitchats, informal hi-hello conversations to formal public speaking.
If the priority of language such as English is to communicate, can we take for granted its counterpart – competence?
Competence gives the impression that proper English is a type of English that highlights grammatical rules, the appropriate pronunciations, diction, and other technicalities of the language. Competence is strict about the formalities of language.
“Grammar Nazis”, linguists or anyone who impose linguistic competence, demand that “One should not speak the language if he/she cannot do it properly”. Seeing Filipinos laughing at fellow Filipinos who try to communicate in English but commit errors is a good example of language speakers who prioritize competence.
Given the two predicaments, what then should be the prime focus of language? Is it communication or competence?
The latter question would be subject for a long list of debates. Some linguists would stress that language are formulated they are spoken to relay messages and as long as the messages are given, it’s just fine. While some would emphasize that proper language speaking should always follow the rules and be uniform with the predetermined standards.
No one can really give a final stand whether the sole purpose of language is to communicate or to be competent. But it is safe to assume that it would always depend on the purpose and setting where the language is being used. If it’s conversational and the speaker just expresses himself, small glitches that he commits in using the language can be definitely accepted as long as he is understood. But if one uses language in public speaking or formal writings, there should be formality present to attain competence.
By: JETHRO M. NOCOM | Teacher I | Hermosa National High School
