The basis in rating government employees’ today is through Results-Based Performance Management System. Some said that, the RPMS is the accurate tool to measure the performance of every employee, it motivates them for excellent performance in consonance with the salaries/incentives they received.
Sample RPMS for teachers with attainable and measurable objectives to produce quality out-put was made by the writer. This will help teachers’ facing difficulty in the formulation of their own RPMS and it will be of great pleasure on the author’s part if his RPMS made were considered as a reference by someone who wishes to use it and it will be also his gratitude if somebody will adopt it.
PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (PCRF) FOR TEACHERS
June _______ to March _______
|
Name of Employee: JESUS B. FRANCO Position: TEACHER I Division: BATAAN (Pagalanggang National High School) |
Name of Rater: JESUS B. FRANCO Position: HEAD TEACHER III Date of Review: ____________________ |
||||||||
|
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING |
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION |
||||||||
|
MFO |
KRAs |
OBJECTIVES |
TIMELINE |
Weight Per KRA |
Performance Indicators (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) |
ACTUAL RESULTS |
RATING |
SCORE |
|
|
Basic Education Service
|
Teaching-Learning Process |
To prepare daily lesson plan/DLL including appropriate and adequate instructional materials and submit every Monday |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
(25%) 10% |
5 – Prepared a complete DLP/DLL including appropriate and adequate instructional materials and submitted every Monday 4 – Prepared a complete DLP/DLL including appropriate and adequate instructional materials but submitted after a week 3 – Prepared a complete DLP/DLL including appropriate and adequate instructional materials but submitted after 2 weeks 2 – Prepared a complete DLP/DLL including appropriate and adequate instructional materials but submitted after 3 weeks 1 – No DLP/DLL prepared and submitted |
||||
|
|
To initiate discipline among students in consonance to classroom/school rules and regulations |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
5% |
5 –100% of the handled students obeyed classroom/school rules and regulations 4.- 85%-99% of the handled students obeyed classroom/school rules and regulations 3 – 70%-84% of the handled students obeyed classroom/school rules and regulations 2 – 55%-69% of the handled students obeyed classroom/school rules and regulations 1 – Below 55% of the handled students obeyed classroom/school rules and regulations |
|||||
|
|
To monitor attendance, diversity appreciation, safe, positive and motivating environment, overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness and orderliness of classrooms including proper waste disposal. |
June2015 to March 2016 |
10% |
5 – 100% students attendance and classroom conducive to learning 4.- 85%-99% students attendance and classroom conducive to learning 3 – 70%-84 students attendance and classroom conducive to learning 2 – 55%-69% students attendance and classroom conducive to learning 1 – Below 55% students attendance and classroom conducive to learning |
|||||
|
|
Pupils/ Students Outcomes |
To monitor, evaluate and maintain students’ progress |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
(25%) 10% |
5 – Achieved 100% quality students` performance within the school year 4 – Achieved 85% – 99% quality students’ performance within the school year 3 – Achieved 70%-84% quality students’ performance within the school year 2 – Achieved 55%-69% quality students` performance within the school year 1 – Achieved less than 55% quality students` performance within the school year |
||||
|
|
To attain zero dropout rate within the school year |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
5% |
5 – No drop out or 0% drop-out rate within the school year 4 – 0.01% to 2% drop-out rate within the school year 3 – 2.01% to 4% drop-out rate within the school year 2 – 4.01% to 6% drop-out rate within the school year 1 – 6.01% and above drop-out rate within the school year |
|||||
|
|
|
To conduct remediation/enrichment programs to improve performance indicators |
June 2015 to March 2016 / as need arises |
5% |
5 – With 100% students` promoted or prepared, submitted and conducted remedial/enrichment programs with 100% of the students under remediation/enrichment promoted 4 – Prepared, submitted and conducted remedial/enrichment programs with 90% of the students under remediation/enrichment promoted 3 – Prepared, submitted and conducted remedial/enrichment programs with 80% of the students under remediation/enrichment promoted 2 – Prepared, submitted and conducted remedial/enrichment programs with 70% of the students under remediation/enrichment promoted 1 – Prepared, submitted and conducted remedial/enrichment programs with less than 70% of the students under remediation/enrichment promoted |
||||
|
|
To prepare/submit updated students’ school records like form 137, form 138, e-class record, class record, LIS, and others |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
5% |
5 – 100% prepared and submitted all needed records on time 4 – Failed to submit 1needed records on time 3 – Failed to submit 2 needed records on time 2 – Failed to submit 3 needed records on time 1 – Failed to submit 4needed records on time |
|||||
|
|
Community Involvement |
●To conduct regular/periodic PTA meetings/conferences to address students’ concern |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
(25%) 10% |
5 -100% attendance of parents 4.- 70%-99% attendance of parents 3 – 40%-69% attendance of parents 2 – 10%-39% attendance of parents 1 – Below 10% attendance of parents |
||||
|
|
|
To visit parents of students needing academic monitoring/follow-up |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
5% |
5 – 100% home visitations undertaken for students needing academic monitoring/follow-up 4.- 85%-99% home visitations undertaken for students needing academic monitoring/follow-up 3 – 70%-84 home visitations undertaken for students needing academic monitoring/follow-up 2 – 55%-69% home visitations undertaken for students needing academic monitoring/follow-up 1 – Below 55% home visitations undertaken for students needing academic monitoring/follow-up |
||||
|
|
|
To undertake/initiate projects/ events/activities with external funding/sponsorship |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
10% |
5 –Generated Php 5,000.00 and above equivalent to school projects/events/activities 4 -Generated Php 3,00.00 – Php 4,999.00 equivalent to school projects/events/activities 3 – Generated Php 1,000.00 – Php 2,999.00 equivalent to school projects/events/activities 2 – Generated Php 1.00 – Php 999.00 equivalent to school projects/events/activities 1 – no amount generated |
||||
|
|
Professional Growth and Development
|
To conduct action research related to school or classroom concerns/ problems during the year |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
(25%) 5% |
5 – Endorsed and approved by the schools division office committee 4 – Endorsed in the schools division office committee 3 – Passed the school level evaluation team/committee 2 – Prepared and submitted to the school department head 1 – no action research prepared |
||||
|
To participate in school and community activities |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
10% |
5 – Participated in all school activities and at least 5 community activities 4 – Missed 1 school activity and participated in at least 4 community activities 3 – Missed 2 school activities and participated in at least 3 community activities 2 – Missed 3 or more school activities and participated in at least 2 community activities 1 – no school and community activities participated |
||||||
|
To produce publications / creative works for school paper/division publication |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
5% |
5 – Produced 4 or more publications/creative works for school paper/division publication within the school year 4 – Produced 3 publications/creative works for school paper/division publication within the school year 3 – Produced 2 publications/creative works for school paper/division publication within the school year 2 – Produced 1 publication/creative work for school paper/division publication within the school year 1 – No publications/creative works for school paper/division publication within the school year |
||||||
|
To receive special awards/ citations/recognitions for exemplary performance or to participate in seminars, workshops, trainings within the school year (school, division, regional, national, international) |
June 2015 to March 2016 |
5% |
5 – Received international/national special awards/citation /recognition or participated in an international/national seminars, workshops, trainings within the school year 4 – Received regional special awards/ citations/recognitions or participated in a regional seminars, workshops, trainings within the school year 3 – Received division special awards/ citations/recognitions or participated in an division seminars, workshops, trainings within the school year 2 – Received school special awards/ citations/recognitions or participated in the school seminars, workshops, trainings within the school year 1 – No special awards/ citations/recognitions Received or no seminars attended |
||||||
|
Overall Rating for Assessment |
|||||||||
|
Adjectival Rating Scale |
|||||||||
Adjectival Rating Scale
|
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor |
= = = = = |
4.500 – 5.000 3.500 – 4.499 2.500 – 3.499 1.500 – 2.499 1.000 – 1.499 |
Approved:
JESUS B. FRANCO JESUS B. FRANCO JESUS B. FRANCO
Ratee Rater School Principal I
|
|
||
|
|
By: JESUS B. FRANCO | HT III | Pagalanggang NHS
